1.What is the author arguing?
The writings presented here are all persuasive pieces written to compel the listener to grant freed slaves the rights equal to those of whites. The Reverend Randall calls for the right of black couples to legally unite in marriage. John Dennis seeks to be reunited with his family and to be able to raise his children. The Black Residents of Nashville in their petition to The Union Convention of Tennessee focus upon their patriotic achievements and desire to live as fully recognized countrymen despite the tragic history of Africans and African Americans.
2. How does the author(s) appeal to logos, pathos, and ethos with their argument?
Each of the three writings uses the same main point of logic to make their appeal: All human beings have the right to live with the same rights as others.If society has acknowledged slavery as wrong, how can it not see the ongoing injustice of denying further, equal rights? The acts of patriotism shown in wartime along with the clear gratitude felt for their freedom reveal their readiness and willingness to participate as recognized citizens. The Black Residents of Nashville state in their petition “We will work, pray, live, and, if need be, die for the Union, as cheerfully as ever a white patriot died for his country.” The emotional expression found in these pieces would be conspicuous only in its absence. John Q.A. Dennis is motivated to write on behalf of his love of family and desire to be able to be a good family man. All three authors address the ethical wrongs of slavery, and the petitioners frame their plea within the analogy of family, “We love the Union by an instinct which is stronger than any argument or appeal which can be used against it. It is the attachment of a child to its parrent.(sic)”.
3. What is the historical significance/relevance of this document?
These writings have significance in their own time and in respect our vantage point over 150 years later. In a nation borne from a struggle for independence, all evidence of and arguments given in the ongoing quest for equality are especially important. These writings show social progress through the merit of both the identity of their authors and the significance of their content. To look back at past struggles enables us to look forward with a wisened eye, and realize there is still much to do in the battle for equal rights for all Americans.
4. Do you find the author’s argument convincing? Why or why not?
As an American lucky enough to have been with the majority of my rights firmly established through no efforts of my own, I naturally find all arguments for freedoms to have merit. The overarching statement by these authors noting their previous contributions and deep desire to take on the responsibilities of equal citizenry is compelling because it combines pragmatism and emotion to promote the reader toward supporting their cause.
